Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy

Abstract
This paper is about philosophical disputes where the literal content of what speakers communicate concerns such object-level issues as ground, supervenience, or real definition. It is tempting to think that such disputes straightforwardly express disagreements about these topics. In contrast to this, I suggest that, in many such cases, the disagreement that is expressed is actually one about which concepts should be employed. I make this case as follows. First, I look at non-philosophical, everyday disputes where a speaker employs a metalinguistic usage of a term. This is where a speaker uses a term to express a view about the meaning of that term, or, relatedly, how to correctly use that term. A metalinguistic negotiation is a metalinguistic dispute that concerns a normative issue about what a word should mean, or, similarly, about how it should be used, rather than the descriptive issue about what it does mean. I argue that the same..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2015.1080184
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,628
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Metaphysics and Conceptual Negotiation.Amie L. Thomasson - 2017 - Philosophical Issues 27 (1):364-382.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Verbal Disputes.David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566.
Simplement, as a Metalinguistic Operator.T. Nyan - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):275-295.
Metalinguistic Negation and Metaphysical Affirmation.Mahrad Almotahari - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):497-517.
Causal Theories of Time.J. J. C. Smart - 1969 - The Monist 53 (3):385-395.
Stalnaker on Mathematical Information.Gerhard Nuffer - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):187-204.
Added to PP index
2015-09-17

Total downloads
105 ( #55,477 of 2,235,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #23,271 of 2,235,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature