Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy

Authors
David Plunkett
Dartmouth College
Abstract
This paper is about philosophical disputes where the literal content of what speakers communicate concerns such object-level issues as ground, supervenience, or real definition. It is tempting to think that such disputes straightforwardly express disagreements about these topics. In contrast to this, I suggest that, in many such cases, the disagreement that is expressed is actually one about which concepts should be employed. I make this case as follows. First, I look at non-philosophical, everyday disputes where a speaker employs a metalinguistic usage of a term. This is where a speaker uses a term to express a view about the meaning of that term, or, relatedly, how to correctly use that term. A metalinguistic negotiation is a metalinguistic dispute that concerns a normative issue about what a word should mean, or, similarly, about how it should be used, rather than the descriptive issue about what it does mean. I argue that the same..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2015.1080184
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Stop Talking About Fake News!Joshua Habgood-Coote - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-33.
Metaphysics and Conceptual Negotiation.Amie L. Thomasson - 2017 - Philosophical Issues 27 (1):364-382.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Verbal Disputes.David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566.
Simplement, as a Metalinguistic Operator.T. Nyan - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):275-295.
Metalinguistic Negation and Metaphysical Affirmation.Mahrad Almotahari - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):497-517.
Causal Theories of Time.J. J. C. Smart - 1969 - The Monist 53 (3):385-395.
Stalnaker on Mathematical Information.Gerhard Nuffer - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):187-204.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-17

Total downloads
114 ( #53,147 of 2,273,321 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #20,843 of 2,273,321 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature