Modern Intellectual History 5 (1):83-96 (2008)

Authors
Jeffrey Pocock
University of London
Abstract
This essay is written on the following premises and argues for them. “Enlightenment” is a word or signifier, and not a single or unifiable phenomenon which it consistently signifies. There is no single or unifiable phenomenon describable as “the Enlightenment,” but it is the definite article rather than the noun which is to be avoided. In studying the intellectual history of the late seventeenth century and the eighteenth, we encounter a variety of statements made, and assumptions proposed, to which the term “Enlightenment” may usefully be applied, but the meanings of the term shift as we apply it. The things are connected, but not continuous; they cannot be reduced to a single narrative; and we find ourselves using the word “Enlightenment” in a family of ways and talking about a family of phenomena, resembling and related to one another in a variety of ways that permit of various generalizations about them. We are not, however, committed to a single root meaning of the word “Enlightenment,” and we do not need to reduce the phenomena of which we treat to a single process or entity to be termed “the” Enlightenment. It is a reification that we wish to avoid, but the structure of our language is such that this is difficult, and we will find ourselves talking of “the French” or “the Scottish,” “the Newtonian” or the “the Arminian” Enlightenments, and hoping that by employing qualifying adjectives we may constantly remind ourselves that the keyword “Enlightenment” is ours to use and should not master us.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1479244307001540
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Enlightenment and its Critics1.Michael A. Peters - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (9):886-894.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the practical enlightenment.You Zhanshi - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (11):1034-1056.
“An Examination of the Role of Women in the Enlightenment”.Dongwoo Kim - 2013 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 4 (2).
Defending the Radical Enlightenment.Charles W. Mills - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:9-29.
Enlightenment: The Crisis and Transformation of the Concept.Mile Savic - 2006 - Filozofija I Društvo 2006 (30):9-29.
Enlightenment Shadows.Genevieve Lloyd - 2013 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-09

Total views
112 ( #97,051 of 2,454,542 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #58,919 of 2,454,542 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes