Mothers' Civil Disobedience

Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 19 (2):27-45 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

"Mothers' Civil Disobedience"In this paper, I consider how the nonviolent civil disobedience of Molly Rush and Cindy Sheehan reflect the inherent ambiguity of mothering in a militaristic society. First, if a mother says nothing and does nothing about the pervasive militarism in society the very lives of her children (as well as other children) are at risk. But, if a mother speaks out against militarism or commits an act of civil disobedience, she risks scorn and imprisonment that can interfere with, or make impossible much of the work of mothering. Second, part of mothering involves raising children to be socially acceptable, but in a militaristic society that which is socially acceptable is morally unacceptable. Rush and Sheehan use their particular context to successfully challenge U.S. militarism through non-violentcivil disobedience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy, deliberation and disobedience.William Smith - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.
Is ecosabotage civil disobedience?Jennifer Welchman - 2001 - Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):97 – 107.
‘Law and order’ and civil disobedience.Fred R. Berger - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):254 – 273.
Ecosabotage and civil disobedience.Michael Martin - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
24 (#661,118)

6 months
9 (#317,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Danielle Poe
University of Dayton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references