Moral universalism and global economic justice

Moral universalism centrally involves the idea that the moral assessment of persons and their conduct, of social rules and states of affairs, must be based on fundamental principles that do not, explicitly or covertly, discriminate arbitrarily against particular persons or groups. This general idea is explicated in terms of three conditions. It is then applied to the discrepancy between our criteria of national and global economic justice. Most citizens of developed countries are unwilling to require of the global economic order what they assuredly require of any national economic order, for example, that its rules be under democratic control, that it preclude life-threatening poverty as far as is reasonably possible. Without a plausible justification, such a double standard constitutes covert arbitrary discrimination against the global poor. Key Words: contextualism • corruption • discrimination • Rawls • resource exports • world poverty.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X02001001002
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality.Andrea Sangiovanni - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2):137–164.
Business Ethics: An Overview.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):956-972.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
275 ( #12,799 of 2,210,836 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #54,431 of 2,210,836 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature