Journal of Philosophy 98 (4):167 - 185 (2001)

Authors
Pierre Poirier
Université du Québec à Montréal
James Blackmon
San Francisco State University
Robert Cummins
University of California, Davis
1 more
Abstract
The current debate over systematicity concerns the formal conditions a scheme of mental representation must satisfy in order to explain the systematicity of thought.1 The systematicity of thought is assumed to be a pervasive property of minds, and can be characterized (roughly) as follows: anyone who can think T can think systematic variants of T, where the systematic variants of T are found by permuting T’s constituents. So, for example, it is an alleged fact that anyone who can think the thought that John loves Mary can think the thought that Mary loves John, where the latter thought is a systematic variant of the former.
Keywords systematicity  language of thought  Fodor  connectionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0022-362X
DOI jphil20019846
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,256
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Language as an Instrument of Thought.Eran Asoulin - 2016 - Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23.
Systematicity Redux.Brian P. McLaughlin - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):251-274.
Smelling Phenomenal.Benjamin D. Young - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
469 ( #14,820 of 2,419,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #123,910 of 2,419,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes