Enzymes 14 (2016)

Authors
Abstract
The peer review is an opportunity to perform an unlawful censorship which ensures that no apostate notion ever get published in mainstream journals. Or such peer review censorship is an opportunity to steal any content and to claim afterward the priority of the first publication. And last but not least, the peer review is an academic tool to promote the mainstream pseudoscience.
Keywords peer review  review  metascience  scientometrics  citation index  fraud  censorship  falsification
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry.David Shatz - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
The Ethics of Peer Review in Bioethics.David Wendler & Franklin Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):697-701.
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1272-1283,.
A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.Mehdi Dadkhah, Mohsen Kahani & Glenn Borchardt - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1603-1610.
Mu H Ado About Peer Review, Part 2.Daryl E. Chubin - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):109-112.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-29

Total views
85 ( #119,164 of 2,419,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #21,983 of 2,419,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes