A recursive semantics for defeasible reasoning


One of the most striking characteristics of human beings is their ability to function successfully in complex environments about which they know very little. In light of our pervasive ignorance, we cannot get around in the world just reasoning deductively from our prior beliefs together with new perceptual input. As our conclusions are not guaranteed to be true, we must countenance the possibility that new information will lead us to change our minds, withdrawing previously adopted beliefs. In this sense, our reasoning is “defeasible”. The question arises how defeasible reasoning works, or ought to work. In particular we need rules governing what a cognizer ought to believe given a set of interacting arguments some of which defeat others. That is what is called a “semantics” for defeasible reasoning, and this chapter will propose a new semantics that avoids certain clear counter-examples to all existing semantics.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The epistemic basis of defeasible reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):437-458.
Defeasible reasoning and logic programming.Timothy R. Colburn - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):417-436.
Abstract argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.
Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.


Added to PP

31 (#519,033)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Defeasible reasoning and degrees of justification.John L. Pollock † - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):7-22.
The Logic of Reasons.Shyam Nair & John Horty - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 67-84.
Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification.Pollock † & L. John - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):7-22.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references