Deductive Reasoning Under Uncertainty: A Water Tank Analogy

Erkenntnis 81 (3):479-506 (2016)

Authors
Guy Politzer
Institut Jean Nicod
Abstract
This paper describes a cubic water tank equipped with a movable partition receiving various amounts of liquid used to represent joint probability distributions. This device is applied to the investigation of deductive inferences under uncertainty. The analogy is exploited to determine by qualitative reasoning the limits in probability of the conclusion of twenty basic deductive arguments (such as Modus Ponens, And-introduction, Contraposition, etc.) often used as benchmark problems by the various theoretical approaches to reasoning under uncertainty. The probability bounds imposed by the premises on the conclusion are derived on the basis of a few trivial principles such as "a part of the tank cannot contain more liquid than its capacity allows", or "if a part is empty, the other part contains all the liquid". This stems from the equivalence between the physical constraints imposed by the capacity of the tank and its subdivisions on the volumes of liquid, and the axioms and rules of probability. The device materializes de Finetti's coherence approach to probability. It also suggests a physical counterpart of Dutch book arguments to assess individuals' rationality in probability judgments in the sense that individuals whose degrees of belief in a conclusion are out of the bounds of coherence intervals would commit themselves to executing physically impossible tasks.
Keywords Uncertain reasoning   inference schemas   de Finetti's coherence   probability logic   qualitative reasoning.
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10670-015-9751-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Reasoning About Uncertain Conditionals.Niki Pfeifer - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (4):849-866.
A Primer of Probability Logic.Ernest Adams - 1998 - Stanford: Csli Publications.
Indicative Conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):269-286.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Uncertain Deductive Reasoning.Niki Pfeifer & G. D. Kleiter - 2011 - In K. Manktelow, D. E. Over & S. Elqayam (eds.), The Science of Reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St B.T. Evans. Psychology Press. pp. 145--166.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
The Uncertain Reasoner: Bayes, Logic, and Rationality.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):105-120.
De Finetti, Countable Additivity, Consistency and Coherence.Colin Howson - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):1-23.
Reasoning with Conditionals.Guy Politzer - 2007 - Topoi 26 (1):79-95.
Deductive Reasoning.Joshua Schechter - 2013 - In Hal Pashler (ed.), The Encyclopedia of the Mind. SAGE Reference.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-28

Total views
79 ( #99,867 of 2,255,372 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #24,866 of 2,255,372 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature