Mathematical determinacy and the transferability of aboutness

Synthese 159 (1):83-98 (2007)
Competent speakers of natural languages can borrow reference from one another. You can arrange for your utterances of ‘Kirksville’ to refer to the same thing as my utterances of ‘Kirksville’. We can then talk about the same thing when we discuss Kirksville. In cases like this, you borrow “ aboutness ” from me by borrowing reference. Now suppose I wish to initiate a line of reasoning applicable to any prime number. I might signal my intention by saying, “Let p be any prime.” In this context, I will be using the term ‘p’ to reason about the primes. Although ‘p’ helps me secure the aboutness of my discourse, it may seem wrong to say that ‘p’ refers to anything. Be that as it may, this paper explores what mathematical discourse would be like if mathematicians were able to borrow freely from one another not just the reference of terms that clearly refer, but, more generally, the sort of aboutness present in a line of reasoning leading up to a universal generalization. The paper also gives reasons for believing that aboutness of this sort really is freely transferable. A key implication will be that the concept “set of natural numbers” suffers from no mathematically significant indeterminacy that can be coherently discussed
Keywords Categoricity  Set theory  Continuum hypothesis
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9069-1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Parts of Classes.David Lewis - 1991 - Blackwell.
Truth and the Absence of Fact.Hartry Field - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Nominalist Platonism.George Boolos - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (3):327-344.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Counting Experiments.Jonathan Livengood - 2017 - Philosophical Studies:1-21.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Hiddenness Argument Revisited.J. L. Schellenberg - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents.Peter J. Taylor - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.
Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics.Robert Batterman - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
How Bad Is Rape?H. E. Baber - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
39 ( #137,093 of 2,197,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,964 of 2,197,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature