BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):25- (2012)
AbstractBackground Research is fundamental to improving the quality of health care. The need for regulation of research is clear. However, the bureaucratic complexity of research governance has raised concerns that the regulatory mechanisms intended to protect participants now threaten to undermine or stifle the research enterprise, especially as this relates to sensitive topics and hard to reach groups. Discussion Much criticism of research governance has focused on long delays in obtaining ethical approvals, restrictions imposed on study conduct, and the inappropriateness of evaluating qualitative studies within the methodological and risk assessment frameworks applied to biomedical and clinical research. Less attention has been given to the different epistemologies underlying biomedical and qualitative investigation. The bioethical framework underpinning current regulatory structures is fundamentally at odds with the practice of emergent, negotiated micro-ethics required in qualitative research. The complex and shifting nature of real world settings delivers unanticipated ethical issues and (occasionally) genuine dilemmas which go beyond easy or formulaic ‘procedural’ resolution. This is not to say that qualitative studies are ‘unethical’ but that their ethical nature can only be safeguarded through the practice of ‘micro-ethics’ based on the judgement and integrity of researchers in the field. Summary This paper considers the implications of contrasting ethical paradigms for the conduct of qualitative research and the value of ‘empirical ethics’ as a means of liberating qualitative (and other) research from an outmoded and unduly restrictive research governance framework based on abstract prinicipalism, divorced from real world contexts and values
Similar books and articles
Ethics and the Internet Issues Associated with Qualitative Research.Denise E. DeLorme, George M. Sinkhan & Warren French - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):271 - 286.
Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.Sonali K. Shah & Kevin G. Corley - manuscript
Looking From the Outside/In: Re-Thinking Research Ethics Review. [REVIEW]Dominique Rivière - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):193-204.
Empirical Ethics in Action: Lessons From Two Empirical Studies in Nursing Ethics.Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, Mieke Grypdonck, Nancy Cannaerts & Els Steeman - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):31-39.
Trust and Integrity in Biomedical Research: The Case of Financial Conflicts of Interest.Thomas H. Murray & Josephine Johnston (eds.) - 2010 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Qualitative Health Research and the Irb: Answering the “so What?” With Qualitative Inquiry. [REVIEW]Mary Ellen Macdonald & Franco A. Carnevale - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1):1-5.
Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research.Marlene de Laine - 2000 - Sage Publications.
Does Empirical Research Make Bioethics More Relevant? “The Embedded Researcher” as a Methodological Approach.Stella Reiter-Theil - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):17-29.
Grey Matter: Ambiguities and Complexities of Ethics in Research. [REVIEW]Joyce Ellen Kennedy - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):143-158.
Getting Beyond Form Filling: The Role of Institutional Governance in Human Research Ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
Evolving Friendships and Shifting Ethical Dilemmas: Fieldworkers’ Experiences in a Short Term Community Based Study in K Enya.Dorcas M. Kamuya, Sally J. Theobald, Patrick K. Munywoki, Dorothy Koech, Wenzel P. Geissler & Sassy C. Molyneux - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (1):1-9.
The Responsible Conduct of Basic and Clinical Research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Huge Variation in Obtaining Ethical Permission for a Non-Interventional Observational Study in Europe.Dylan W. de Lange, Bertrand Guidet, Finn H. Andersen, Antonio Artigas, Guidio Bertolini, Rui Moreno, Steffen Christensen, Maurizio Cecconi, Christina Agvald-Ohman, Primoz Gradisek, Christian Jung, Brian J. Marsh, Sandra Oeyen, Bernardo Bollen Pinto, Wojciech Szczeklik, Ximena Watson, Tilemachos Zafeiridis & Hans Flaatten - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):39.
Emerging Issues in Paediatric Health Research Consent Forms in Canada: Working Towards Best Practices. [REVIEW]Edward S. Dove, Denise Avard, Lee Black & Bartha M. Knoppers - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):1-10.
Reflections of Methodological and Ethical Challenges in Conducting Research During COVID-19 Involving Resettled Refugee Youth in Canada.Zoha Salam, Elysee Nouvet & Lisa Schwartz - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (10):769-773.
Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents, Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.Minisha Lohani, Kristopher A. Hendershot, Wendy Pelletier, Kristin Stegenga, Margie Dixon, Pamela Hinds, Melissa A. Alderfer & Rebecca D. Pentz - 2018 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 40 (4):1-7.
Ethical Challenges in Researching and Telling the Stories of Recently Deceased People.Glenys Caswell & Nicola Turner - 2020 - Research Ethics 17 (2):162-175.
References found in this work
Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Empirical Ethics: A Challenge to Bioethics.Pascal Borry, Paul Schotsmans & Kris Dierickx - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):1-3.
Ethical Issues at the Interface of Clinical Care and Research Practice in Pediatric Oncology: A Narrative Review of Parents' and Physicians' Experiences.Martine C. de Vries, Mirjam Houtlosser, Jan M. Wit, Dirk P. Engberts, Dorine Bresters, Gertjan Jl Kaspers & Evert van Leeuwen - 2011 - BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):18.
Consistency in Decision Making by Research Ethics Committees: A Controlled Comparison.E. Angell, A. J. Sutton, K. Windridge & M. Dixon-Woods - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):662-664.