Self-defeating arguments

Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392 (1991)
Abstract
An argument is self-defeating when it contains defeaters for some of its own defeasible lines. It is shown that the obvious rules for defeat among arguments do not handle self-defeating arguments correctly. It turns out that they constitute a pervasive phenomenon that threatens to cripple defeasible reasoning, leading to almost all defeasible reasoning being defeated by unexpected interactions with self-defeating arguments. This leads to some important changes in the general theory of defeasible reasoning.
Keywords Argument  defeasible  nonmonotonic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00352916
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Defeasible Reasoning.John Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
Knowledge and Justification.John Pollock - 1970 - Princeton University Press.
Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1961 - Middletown, Conn., Wesleyan University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rationality, Function, and Content.John L. Pollock - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2):129-151.
Oscar.John L. Pollock - 1996 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 6 (1):89-113.
A Formal Account of Socratic-Style Argumentation.Martin W. A. Caminada - 2008 - Journal of Applied Logic 6 (1):109-132.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
74 ( #73,024 of 2,191,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,930 of 2,191,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature