You can't have your hypothesis and test it: The importance of utilities in theories of reasoning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):87-88 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mercier and Sperber's (M&S's) theory of reasoning cannot predict reasoning in the absence of an argumentative context. Applying the theory to hypothesis testing behavior, I propose that hypothesis testing is often motivated by determining the true inference and that reasoning models should account for utilities (affected by various motives, including the wish to convince) of reasoning outcomes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defence of the Ramsey Test.Richard Bradley - 2007 - Mind 116 (461):1-21.
Partition-Theorems for Causal Decision Theories.Jordan Howard Sobel - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (1):70-93.
Decision Theory and Cognitive Choice.John R. Welch - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2):147-172.
Ceteris Paribus Conditions as Prior Knowledge: A View From Economics.Neil De Marchi & Jinbang Kim - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:317 - 325.
The Age of the Universe.J. T. Davies - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (19):191-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
18 (#607,714)

6 months
1 (#416,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?