Agriculture and Human Values:1-10 (forthcoming)
AbstractEnd of April 2021, the European Commission published its study on New Genomic Techniques. The study involved a consultation of Member States and stakeholders. This study reveals a split on whether current legislation should be maintained or adapted to take account of scientific progress and the risk level of NGT products. This split was predictable. New technological developments challenge both ethical viewpoints and regulatory institutions; and contribute to the growing divide between science and society that value ‘technological innovations’ differently. Such controversies are often characterized as ‘unstructured’ because of nearly unbridgeable positions on entangled scientific and value-laden issues. Initiatives for stakeholder involvement, such as consultation or participation, often focus on reaching a ‘shared vision’ without exploring the diverse societal concerns and values behind these positions. To resolve the EU stalemate in NGT regulation, we advocate to bring back politics in the EU decision-making process instead of hiding it under the veil of science, the need for regulatory change and public support. A more productive and justified use of genuine stakeholder participation is possible, if participants and deliberation design meet the criteria of what we call participation ethics. Drawing from our applied experience exploring the ethics of genetic modification, we believe that this approach can lead to more robust political decision-making and restore societal confidence in the governance of contested issues such as NGTs.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.Lynn J. Frewer & Gene Rowe - 2005 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (2):251-290.
Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe. [REVIEW]Rob Hagendijk & Alan Irwin - 2006 - Minerva 44 (2):167-184.
NGO Perspectives on the Social and Ethical Dimensions of Plant Genome-Editing.Richard Helliwell, Sarah Hartley & Warren Pearce - 2019 - Agriculture and Human Values 36 (4):779-791.
Coping with Intractable Controversies: The Case for Problem Structuring in Policy Design and Analysis.Matthijs Hisschemöller & Rob Hoppe - 1995 - Knowledge and Policy 8 (4):40-60.
Domestication, Crop Breeding, and Genetic Modification Are Fundamentally Different Processes: Implications for Seed Sovereignty and Agrobiodiversity.Natalie G. Mueller & Andrew Flachs - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (1):455-472.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism.John A. Lynch, Aaron J. Goldenberg, Kyle B. Brothers & Nanibaa' A. Garrison - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):51-63.
Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings.Maya Sabatello & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (2):292-308.
Michel Foucault’s Techniques of the Self and the Christian Politics of Obedience.Alexandre Macmillan - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (4):3-25.
Conceptual Explorations Around “Politics”.Kari Palonen - 2021 - Contributions to the History of Concepts 16 (1):16-39.
Ethical Issues and Potential Stakeholder Priorities Associated with the Application of Genomic Technologies Applied to Animal Production Systems.David Coles, Lynn J. Frewer & Ellen Goddard - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):231-253.
Societal Impact Measurement of Research Papers.Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 609-632.
Ontologies and Politics of Biogenomic 'Race'.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther & Jonathan Michael Kaplan - 2013 - Theoria. A Journal of Social and Political Theory (South Africa) 60 (3):54-80.
(Un)Troubling Identity Politics: A Cultural Materialist Intervention.Marie Moran - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):258-277.
Ethical Turns: Adorno Defended Against His Devotees.Lambert Zuidervaart - 2009 - Symposium 13 (1):22-39.
Sequence Matters: Genomic Research and the Gene Concept.Laura Perini - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):752-762.
A Principled Approach to Cross‐Sector Genomic Data Access.Marcus Smith & Seumas Miller - 2021 - Wiley: Bioethics 35 (8):779-786.
Religion as a Means to Societal Cohesion in Nordic Politics 1988-2010.Jonas Lindberg - 2015 - The Politics and Religion Journal 9 (2):147-168.