Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 29 (60):10-25 (2020)

This article ponders the questions of why so many literary scholars want to bring literary and economic issues together now, and why it seems so difficult to establish a genuinely cross-disciplinary con-versation.1 Offering two examples of approaches to the intersec-tion of literary and economic issues that privilege methodology over themes, history, or theory—a very brief genealogy of the concept of a national economy and an equally brief analysis of derivatives—the article calls for an ongoing reflection on whether literary and cultural scholars have the right tools for the job and, conversely, the right job for our tools.
Keywords Derivatives  Economics  Finance  Interdisciplinarity  Literary studies  Methodology  National Economy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.7146/nja.v29i60.122834
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evaluating Ethical Tools.Payam Moula & Per Sandin - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (2):263-279.
Artifacts and Cognition: Evolution or Cultural Progress?Bruce Bridgeman - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):403-403.
Tools as “Petrified Memes”: A Duality.Carsten Korth - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,224,321 of 2,432,670 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,418 of 2,432,670 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes