A note on the difference between the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and the Einstein contraction

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1966
DOI 10.1093/bjps/XVI.64.332
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Touch of Malice.J. Agassi - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):107-119.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis.Adolf Grünbaum - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.
The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis.Herbert Dingle - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):228-229.
The “Reality” of the Lorentz Contraction.Dennis Dieks - 1984 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):330-342.
Discussions: Thb Falsifiability Op the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis.Adolf Grünbaum - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
274 ( #13,429 of 2,210,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #166,029 of 2,210,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature