Compound figures: priority and speech-act structure

Philosophical Studies 174 (1):141-161 (2017)
Authors
Mihaela Popa-Wyatt
University of Birmingham
Abstract
Compound figures are a rich, and under-explored area for tackling fundamental issues in philosophy of language. This paper explores new ideas about how to explain some features of such figures. We start with an observation from Stern that in ironic-metaphor, metaphor is logically prior to irony in the structure of what is communicated. Call this thesis Logical-MPT. We argue that a speech-act-based explanation of Logical-MPT is to be preferred to a content-based explanation. To create this explanation we draw on Barker’s expressivist speech-act theory, in which speech-acts build on other speech-acts to achieve the desired communicative effects. In particular, we show how Barker’s general ideas explain metaphor as an assertive-act, and irony as a ridiculing-act. We use Barker’s notion of proto-illocutionary-acts to show how metaphorical-acts and ironic-acts can build one on the other. Finally, we show that while an ironic-act can build on a metaphorical-act, a metaphorical-act cannot build on an ironic-act. This restriction on how they can be composed establishes Logical-MPT via a different route
Keywords Metaphor  Irony  Ironic-metaphor  Metaphor-priority thesis  Embedding  Proto-illocutionary-acts  Speech-act composition
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0629-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltan Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219-261.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Embedding Irony and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.Mihaela Popa-Wyatt - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-26.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Illokutionäre Akte und Konventionalität.Friedrich Christoph Dörge - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60 (1):125-150.
Transformations of Illocutionary Acts.Aaron Sloman - 1969 - Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.
Figures of Speech.Ernie Lepore & Matthew Stone - 2012 - The Philosophers' Magazine 56 (56):31-41.
Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Acts.Maciej Witek - 2013 - Dialogue and Universalism 23 (1):129-141.
Failing to Do Things with Words.Nicole Wyatt - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):135-142.
Speech Acts and Poetry.Leni Garcia - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-27

Total views
83 ( #82,479 of 2,312,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #54,714 of 2,312,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature