Compound figures: priority and speech-act structure

Philosophical Studies 174 (1):141-161 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Compound figures are a rich, and under-explored area for tackling fundamental issues in philosophy of language. This paper explores new ideas about how to explain some features of such figures. We start with an observation from Stern that in ironic-metaphor, metaphor is logically prior to irony in the structure of what is communicated. Call this thesis Logical-MPT. We argue that a speech-act-based explanation of Logical-MPT is to be preferred to a content-based explanation. To create this explanation we draw on Barker’s expressivist speech-act theory, in which speech-acts build on other speech-acts to achieve the desired communicative effects. In particular, we show how Barker’s general ideas explain metaphor as an assertive-act, and irony as a ridiculing-act. We use Barker’s notion of proto-illocutionary-acts to show how metaphorical-acts and ironic-acts can build one on the other. Finally, we show that while an ironic-act can build on a metaphorical-act, a metaphorical-act cannot build on an ironic-act. This restriction on how they can be composed establishes Logical-MPT via a different route

Similar books and articles

Transformations of Illocutionary Acts.Aaron Sloman - 1969 - Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.
Figures of speech.Ernie Lepore & Matthew Stone - 2012 - The Philosophers' Magazine 56 (56):31-41.
Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Acts.Maciej Witek - 2013 - Dialogue and Universalism 23 (1):129-141.
Failing to do things with words.Nicole Wyatt - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):135-142.
Speech Acts and Poetry.Leni Garcia - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-27

Downloads
496 (#38,697)

6 months
121 (#33,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mihaela Popa-Wyatt
University of Manchester

References found in this work

Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Récanati - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.

View all 24 references / Add more references