- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality
In Mark Amadeus Notturno (ed.), The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge. pp. 33-64 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Call number
Q175.P8633 1994
ISBN(s)
0415113202 9780415135559 0415135559 9780203535806
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Between Chomskian rationalism and Popperian empiricism.Stephen P. Stich - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):329-47.
The Myth of the Framework: In defence of science and rationality Karl R. Popper, edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, xiii + 229 pp. £27.50.Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In defence of interaction Karl R. Popper, edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, ix + 158 pp. £25. [REVIEW]John Watkins - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (276):315-.
The Myth of the Framework. In Defense of Science and Rationality. [REVIEW]John G. McEvoy - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):388-390.
Reason, rationality, and reasonableness.Doan Travann - 2001 - Washington, D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
181 (#76,979)
6 months
7 (#129,163)
2009-01-28
Downloads
181 (#76,979)
6 months
7 (#129,163)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.Uwe Peters - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1061-1081.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):562-570.
Mandevillian Intelligence: From Individual Vice to Collective Virtue.Paul Smart - 2018 - In Joseph Adam Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, Spyridon Orestis Palermos & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Socially-Extended Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 253–274.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-768c78dffc-czrrn N