Backward conditioning of the eyelid response

Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (4):403 (1938)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0062223

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sensitization and association in eyelid conditioning.D. A. Grant - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (3):201.
Backward conditioned eyelid reactions.H. Cason - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (5):599.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Anxiety and strength of the UCS as determiners of the amount of eyelid conditioning.K. W. Spence & Janet Taylor - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (3):183.
Backward conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response: A test using second-order conditioning.Steven D. Stern & Peter W. Frey - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (4):231-234.
Onset versus termination of a stimulus as the CS in eyelid conditioning.Wesley J. Hansche & David A. Grant - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (1):19.
Effects of omitted versus delayed UCS on classical eyelid conditioning under partial reinforcement.John W. Moore & Isidore Gormezano - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):248.
A methodological study of the form and latency of eyelid responses in conditioning.Kenneth W. Spence & Leonard E. Ross - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):376.
Acquisition and extinction of human eyelid conditioned response as a function of schedule of reinforcement and unconditioned stimulus intensity under two masked conditioning procedures.Bryce C. Schurr & Willard N. Runquist - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):398.
Performance in eyelid conditioning following interpolated presentations of the UCS.K. P. Goodrich, L. E. Ross & A. R. Wagner - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):214.
Failures to obtain mediated generalization effects in eyelid conditioning.G. Robert Grice, Howard J. Simmons & John J. Hunter - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):485.
Awareness predicts the magnitude of single-cue trace eyeblink conditioning.James W. Manns, R. Clark & L. R. Squire - 2000 - Hippocampus 10 (2):181-186.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS.M. A. Trapold & K. W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
7 (#1,356,784)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Associative symmetry: I.Position learning in the gerbil.Leonard Brosgole & Camilla Lepak - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (1):99-102.
Backward conditioning: An artifact of experimental design?Cooper B. Holmes & Stephen F. Davis - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (6):431-432.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references