Milano MI, Italia: Psiche e Realtà - Tecniche Nuove (2014)

Authors
Antonio Portaluri
Università MEIER
Abstract
On October 24th, 1927, the world's most important physicists met in Brussels for what is known as the fifth edition of the Solvay Conference. The focus of the discussion was the new Quantum Mechanics, to which most of the people present at the meeting had contributed but about which they had contrasting opinions. On the one hand, Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg claimed they had provided the new science with a definite structure, not subject to further modifications, while on the other, eminent figures such as Erwin Schrodinger and Albert Einstein believed that the theories put forward by the so called Copenhagen School, of which Bohr and Heisenberg were the most important exponents, were incorrect or at least incomplete.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Schrödinger's Cat.Henry Stapp - 2009 - In Daniel Greenberger, Klaus Hentschel & Friedel Weinert (eds.), Compendium of Quantum Physics. Springer. pp. 685-689.
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Niels Bohr’s Generalization of Classical Mechanics.Peter Bokulich - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):347-371.
Understanding Einstein’s Viewpoint on Quantum Mechanics.Fátima Masot-Conde - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (2):53-65.
Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate.Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114.
Bohr, Einstein and Realism.Wojciech Daniel - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (3):249-261.
Knowledge and Description: Bohr's Epistemology.John T. Sanders - 1998 - In Jan Such & Malgorzata Szczesniak (eds.), Z epistemologii wiedzy naukowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-07

Total views
31 ( #341,626 of 2,432,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #97,385 of 2,432,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes