Reply To Carolyn Ray:How Not To Read A Book
Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (8):405-410 (2002)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
TOM PORTER replies to a review of Ayn Rand’s Theory of Knowledge by Carolyn Ray . He argues that Ray misunderstands his book because she assumes it needn’t be read from the beginning
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reply to Carolyn Ray, "Porter's Rand: A Commentary" (Fall 2001) How Not to Read a Book.Tom Porter - 2003 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (2):405 - 410.
Porter's Rand: A Commentary. [REVIEW]Carolyn Ray - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):117 - 124.
Rejoinder to Tom Porter: Second Thoughts.Carolyn Ray - 2003 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (2):411.
Replies to Weatherson, Chalmers, Weinberg, and Bengson.Herman Cappelen - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):577-600.
Re-Reading Atlas Shrugged. [REVIEW]J. H. Huebert - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (1):193 - 205.
Review of Carolyn Price, Functions in Mind: A Theory of Intentional Content. [REVIEW]Lisa Bortolotti - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):380 – 381.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch – by Phil Hutchinson, Rupert Read and Wes Sharrock.Carolyn Wilde - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (2):191-199.
Misreadings, Clarifications and Reminders: A Reply to Hutchinson and Read.Daniel D. Hutto - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):561 – 567.
Book Review: Galatians. [REVIEW]Carolyn Osiek - 2000 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 54 (3):326-326.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-02-04
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2015-02-04
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.