Reply To Carolyn Ray:How Not To Read A Book

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (8):405-410 (2002)

Thomas Porter
University of Manchester
TOM PORTER replies to a review of Ayn Rand’s Theory of Knowledge by Carolyn Ray . He argues that Ray misunderstands his book because she assumes it needn’t be read from the beginning
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,256
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Porter's Rand: A Commentary. [REVIEW]Carolyn Ray - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):117 - 124.
Rejoinder to Tom Porter: Second Thoughts.Carolyn Ray - 2003 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (2):411.
Replies to Weatherson, Chalmers, Weinberg, and Bengson.Herman Cappelen - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):577-600.
How Not to Read a Book.Tom Porter - 2003 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (2).
Re-Reading Atlas Shrugged. [REVIEW]J. H. Huebert - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (1):193 - 205.
Who is God?Carolyn Nystrom - 1993 - Moody Press.
Misreadings, Clarifications and Reminders: A Reply to Hutchinson and Read.Daniel D. Hutto - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):561 – 567.
On Literature.Hillis Miller - 2002 - Routledge.
Book Review: Galatians. [REVIEW]Carolyn Osiek - 2000 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 54 (3):326-326.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes