The Relationship Between Workers and Animals in the Pork Industry: A Shared Suffering

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (1):3-17 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal production, especially pork production, is facing growing international criticism. The greatest concerns relate to the environment, the animals’ living conditions, and the occupational diseases. But human and animal conditions are rarely considered together. Yet the living conditions at work and the emotional bond that inevitably forms bring the farm workers and the animals to live very close, which leads to shared suffering. Suffering does spread from animals to human beings and can cause workers physical, mental, and also moral suffering, which is all the more harmful due to the fact that it is concealed. The conceptual tools used to conceal suffering ( animal welfare, stress, pain) suggest that the industrial system can be improved, whereas for farmers it is by definition incompatible with animal husbandry

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-08

Downloads
119 (#151,516)

6 months
11 (#242,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Animals and why they matter.Mary Midgley - 1983 - Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters?Patrick D. Hopkins & Austin Dacey - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):579-596.
La barbarie.Michel Henry - 1987 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 177 (3):327-329.
Animal rearing as a contract?Catherine Larrère & Raphaël Larrère - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):51-58.

Add more references