ABSTRACTThis paper explores the structure and elements of the intentional experiences of imagining fictional objects. The author critically examines the argument that whereas Husserl’s theory of imagination cannot do justice to fictional objects, Ingarden’s theory of purely intentional objects provides a basis for the theory of intentionality that explains the status of fictional objects. The paper discusses this argument to show that it is justified only in regard to Husserl’s early account of imagination, and on the condition of understanding contents as the phantasmas. Moreover, the author sketches Ingarden’s theory of imagination, and compares it to Husserl’s later account of imagination in terms of noetic-noematic structures. Finally, the author questions the sharp distinction between Husserl and Ingarden with respect to their theories of imagination and fictional objects by showing that it is hard to classify clearly their theories as content or object theories respectively.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00071773.2019.1629553
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Experience and Judgment.Edmund Husserl, L. Landgrebe, J. S. Churchill & K. Ameriks - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 39 (4):712-713.
The Nature of Fiction.Susan L. Feagin - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (4):948.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ingarden Vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction.Barry Smith - 1980 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):93-105.
Ingarden versus Meinong o logice fikcji.Barry Smith - 1998 - In Z. Muszyński (ed.), Z badań nad prawdą i poznaniem. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMC-S. pp. 283–296.
Vague Fictional Objects.Elisa Paganini - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (2):158-184.
Endurance and Temporality.Marek Piwowarczyk - 2010 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):157-169.
Actualisme Et Fiction.Jérôme Pelletier - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (1):77-.
Fictional Objects.Glen R. Koehn - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
The Ontology of Fiction.Michael Edward Gettings - 1999 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Review of Anthony Everett, The Nonexistent. [REVIEW]Catharine Abell - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2):209-212.
Erwartungshorizont: Über eine literarische Hermeneutik, die Ingarden nie schrieb.Gerardo Arguelles-Fernandez - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (1):137-164.
Fictional Realism.Ioan Motoarca - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #368,463 of 2,506,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,234 of 2,506,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes