Erkenntnis 74 (3):305-319 (2011)

Authors
Angela Potochnik
University of Cincinnati
Abstract
An historically important conception of the unity of science is explanatory reductionism, according to which the unity of science is achieved by explaining all laws of science in terms of their connection to microphysical law. There is, however, a separate tradition that advocates the unity of science. According to that tradition, the unity of science consists of the coordination of diverse fields of science, none of which is taken to have privileged epistemic status. This alternate conception has roots in Otto Neurath’s notion of unified science. In this paper, I develop a version of the coordination approach to unity that is inspired by Neurath’s views. The resulting conception of the unity of science achieves aims similar to those of explanatory reductionism, but does so in a radically different way. As a result, it is immune to the criticisms facing explanatory reductionism. This conception of unity is also importantly different from the view that science is disunified, and I conclude by demonstrating how it accords better with scientific practice than do conceptions of the disunity of science
Keywords unity of science  Otto Neurath  reductionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-010-9228-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Limitations of Hierarchical Organization.Angela Potochnik & Brian McGill - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (1):120-140.
Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology.Daniel J. Nicholson & Richard Gawne - 2014 - Journal of the History of Biology 47 (2):243-292.
Unificatory Explanation.Marco J. Nathan - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1).
Compte-Rendu: Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science.David Ludwig - 2015 - Lato Sensu, Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 2 (1).

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Unity of Science.Martin Carrier - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):17-31.
Explanatory Disunities and the Unity of Science.David Davies - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):5 – 21.
Scientific Practice and the Disunity of Physics.Andreas Hüttemann - 1998 - Philosophia Naturalis 35 (1):209-222.
Unity, Theism and Self in Plotinus.Donald N. Blakeley - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 7 (1):53-80.
Cosmology, Particles, and the Unity of Science.Henrik Zinkernagel - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (3):493-516.
The Appearance of Unity: A Higher-Order Interpretation of the Unity of Consciousness.Josh Weisberg - 2001 - Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society.
Concepts, Theories, And The Mind-Body Problem.Herbert Feigl (ed.) - 1958 - University of Minnesota Press.
Unified Theories and Disparate Things.Margaret Morrison - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:365 - 373.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-18

Total views
744 ( #8,222 of 2,448,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #10,550 of 2,448,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes