Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice?

Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):205 – 217 (1990)
Abstract
This paper comments on some of the different senses of the notion of discourse in the various relevant literatures and then overviews the basic features of a coherent discourse analytic programme in Psychology. Parker's approach is criticised for (a) its tendency to reify discourses as objects; (b) its undeveloped notion of analytic practice; (c) its vulnerability to common sense assumptions. It ends by exploring the virtues of 'interpretative repertoires' over 'discourses' as an analytic/theoretical notion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089008572999
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Hutchinson & Co.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Real Things: Discourse, Context and Practice.Ian Parker - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):227 – 233.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-03-08

Total downloads
249 ( #14,360 of 2,180,802 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #153,753 of 2,180,802 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums