Normative consent and presumed consent for organ donation: a critique

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):498-499 (2010)
Abstract
Ben Saunders claims that actual consent is not necessary for organ donation due to ‘normative consent’, a concept he borrows from David Estlund. Combining normative consent with Peter Singer's ‘greater moral evil principle’, Saunders argues that it is immoral for an individual to refuse consent to donate his or her organs. If a presumed consent policy were thus adopted, it would be morally legitimate to remove organs from individuals whose wishes concerning donation are not known. This paper disputes Saunders' arguments. First, if death caused by the absence of organ transplant is the operational premise, then, there is nothing of comparable moral precedence under which a person is not obligated to donate. Saunders' use of Singer's principle produces a duty to donate in almost all circumstances. However, this premise is based on a flawed interpretation of cause and effect between organ availability and death. Second, given growing moral and scientific agreement that the organ donors in heart-beating and non-heart-beating procurement protocols are not dead when their organs are surgically removed, it is not at all clear that people have a duty to consent to their lives being taken for their organs. Third, Saunders' claim that there can be good reasons for refusing consent clashes with his claim that there is a moral obligation for everyone to donate their organs. Saunders' argument is more consistent with a conclusion of ‘mandatory consent’. Finally, it is argued that Saunders' policy, if put into place, would be totalitarian in scope and would therefore be inconsistent with the freedom required for a democratic society
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2010.036624
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,658
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Presumed Consent, Autonomy, and Organ Donation.Michael B. Gill - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):37 – 59.
Can Consent Be Presumed?Govert den Hartogh - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):295-307.
Normative Consent and Opt-Out Organ Donation.B. Saunders - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (2):84-87.
Organ Donation by Capital Prisoners in China: Reflections in Confucian Ethics.M. Wang & X. Wang - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):197-212.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Consent and Its Cousins.William A. Edmundson - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
The Possibility of Consent.David Owens - 2011 - Ratio 24 (4):402-421.
Presumed Consent for Organ Retrieval.Arthur J. Matas & Frank J. Veith - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

69 ( #76,073 of 2,169,723 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #60,863 of 2,169,723 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums