Progress and current challenges with the quantum similarity model
Emmanuel M. Pothos, Albert Barque-Duran, James M. Yearsley, Jennifer S. Trueblood, Jerome R. Busemeyer & James A. Hampton
Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
A quantum geometric model of similarity.Emmanuel M. Pothos, Jerome R. Busemeyer & Jennifer S. Trueblood - 2013 - Psychological Review 120 (3):679-696.
Quantum probability theory as a common framework for reasoning and similarity.Jennifer S. Trueblood, Emmanuel M. Pothos & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.Jerome R. Busemeyer, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Riccardo Franco & Jennifer S. Trueblood - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):193-218.
A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning.Jennifer S. Trueblood & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
A Quantum Probability Account of Order Effects in Inference.Jennifer S. Trueblood & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (8):1518-1552.
The discontinuity between rules and similarity.Peter F. Dominey - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):22-23.
The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition.Zheng Wang, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Harald Atmanspacher & Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):672-688.
A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction.Zheng Wang & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):689-710.
A critique of the similarity space theory of concepts.Christopher Gauker - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (4):317–345.
The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.James A. Hampton - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):290 - 291.
Locating Value in Moral Progress.Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (1):137-52.
Quantum principles in psychology: The debate, the evidence, and the future.Emmanuel M. Pothos & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):310-327.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#670,075)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#670,075)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
References found in this work
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems.Paul Smolensky - 1990 - Artificial Intelligence 46 (1-2):159-216.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.Jerome R. Busemeyer, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Riccardo Franco & Jennifer S. Trueblood - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):193-218.