Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):37-49 (2005)

Abstract
This response to the open peer commentary discusses what should be the appropriate explanatory scope of a rules versus similarity proposal and accordingly evaluates the Rules versus Similarity one. Additionally, coherence, goals, and commitment are presented as inferential notions, fully consistent with the Rules versus Similarity distinction, that allow us to predict when Rules would be preferred to Similarity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05470016
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,920
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
21 ( #505,285 of 2,439,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,168 of 2,439,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes