Carmina Philosophiae 18:127-135 (2009)
Peter Abelard's claim that universals are only words is well known, yet its metaphysical bearing for Abelard's philosophy is much disputed. Peter King has recently suggested that Abelard's nominalism is only an element of his larger irrealist metaphysic. Against this interpretation, I argue that Abelard's view is better understood as a form of moderate realism and a development of the solution attempted by Boethius in his Second Commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge. Both Abelard and Boethius clearly deny the independent existence of universals, yet they should not be called irrealists, since they agree that universal words or concepts have a firm basis in real, individual things.
|Keywords||Peter Abelard Boethius medieval problem of universals Peter King status universals metaphysics realism nominalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Abelard on Status and Their Relation to Universals.Mark K. Spencer - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):223-240.
Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and Its Problems.Riin Sirkel - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
The Rediscovery of Peter Abelard's Philosophy.John Marenbon - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):331-351.
Abelard on Mental Language.Peter King - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):169-187.
Peculiar Perfection: Peter Abelard on Propositional Attitudes.Martin Lenz - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):377-386.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads65 ( #80,130 of 2,163,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #33,553 of 2,163,853 )
How can I increase my downloads?