Against Theological Fictionalism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):427 - 437 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to theological fictionalism, God has the same status as a fictional character in a novel or a movie. Such a claim has been defended by Robin Le Poidevin on the basis of Kendall Walton’s theory of make believe. But it is not only a philosophical esoteric account of religious beliefs, it is now an exoteric view, sometimes accepted by "believers" themselves, and so could even be considered a postmodern heresy. But theological fictionalism does not work: faith is real assent and not make believe; belief is different from acceptance; belief and faith are dispositional, but make believe seems to presuppose an account of beliefs as occurrent states; we cannot anymore imagine at will than we can believe at will

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Fictionalism and Misleading Analogies.François Jaquet - 2024 - In Richard Joyce & Stuart Brock (eds.), Moral Fictionalism and Religious Fictionalism. Oxford University Press.
Defiction?Alberto Voltolini - 2013 - In Carola Barbero, Maurizio Ferraris & Alberto Voltolini (eds.), From Fictionalism to Realism. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Fictionalism and the folk.Adam Toon - 2016 - The Monist 99 (3):280-295.
Metalinguistic Agnosticism, Religious Fictionalism and the Reasonable Believer.Jacob Hesse - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):197-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-02

Downloads
151 (#129,043)

6 months
709 (#1,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roger Pouivet
Université de Lorraine

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taylor on truth.Richard Rorty - 1994 - In Charles Taylor, James Tully & Daniel M. Weinstock (eds.), Philosophy in an age of pluralism: the philosophy of Charles Taylor in question. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 20--36.

Add more references