European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):427 - 437 (2011)
According to theological fictionalism, God has the same status as a fictional character in a novel or a movie. Such a claim has been defended by Robin Le Poidevin on the basis of Kendall Walton’s theory of make believe. But it is not only a philosophical esoteric account of religious beliefs, it is now an exoteric view, sometimes accepted by "believers" themselves, and so could even be considered a postmodern heresy. But theological fictionalism does not work: faith is real assent and not make believe; belief is different from acceptance; belief and faith are dispositional, but make believe seems to presuppose an account of beliefs as occurrent states; we cannot anymore imagine at will than we can believe at will
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Return of Moral Fictionalism.Nadeem J. Z. Hussain - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):149–188.
Philosophy of Religion, Fictionalism, and Religious Diversity.Victoria Harrison - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):43-58.
Modal Fictionalism, Possible Worlds, and Artificiality.Andrea Sauchelli - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (4):411-21.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-02
Total downloads1 ( #865,213 of 2,152,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,478 of 2,152,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.