Law and Philosophy 15 (4):369 - 386 (1996)

Authors
Madison Powers
Georgetown University
Abstract
Many of the contemporary disagreements regarding privacy are conceptual in nature. They concern the meaning or definition of privacy and the analytic basis of distinguishing privacy rights from other kinds of rights recognized within moral, political, or legal theories. The two main alternatives within this debate include reductionist views, which seek a narrow account of the kinds of invasions or intrusions distinctly involving privacy losses, and anti-reductionist theories, which treat a much broader array of interferences with a person as separate and irreducible kinds of privacy invasions. Other theorists have expressed doubts about the prospects for achieving greater analytical precision even within a fairly expansive anti-reductionist approach. However, a reductionist privacy definition is defended in this article, and its primary theoretical virtues are its ability to unify and explain the insights of several competing definitions and its role in developing an account of privacy rights that is both internally coherent and consistent with a plausible understanding of the theoretical basis for a number of related rights
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00127211
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Right to Privacy.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):295-314.
Privacy, Morality, and the Law.W. A. Parent - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4):269-288.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.Jeffrey H. Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.
Recent Work on the Concept of Privacy.W. A. Parent - 1983 - American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (4):341 - 355.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Framework for Analyzing and Comparing Privacy States.Alan Rubel & Ryan Biava - 2014 - JASIST: The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 65 (12):2422-2431.
The Right to Privacy and the Right to Die: TOM L. BEAUCHAMP.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):276-292.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Right to Privacy.Janet E. Smith - 2008 - Ignatius Press.
The Right to Privacy Unveiled.Samuel C. Rickless - 2007 - San Diego Law Review 44 (1):773-799.
Is There a Right to Privacy?Steven Davis - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
Values Education and the Right to Privacy.Alan L. Lockwood - 1977 - Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):9-26.
A New Definition of Privacy for the Law.W. A. Parent - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (3):305 - 338.
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
32 ( #358,845 of 2,519,441 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,441 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes