In B. Mölder, V. Arstila & P. Øhrstrøm (eds.), Philosophy and Psychology of Time. Springer. pp. 69-100 (2016)

Authors
Sean Enda Power
University of Leeds (PhD)
Abstract
Different ways of thinking about presence can have significant consequences for one's thinking about temporal experience. Temporal presence can be conceived of as either absolute or relative. Relative presence is analogous to spatial presence, whereas absolute presence is not. For each of these concepts of presence, there is a theory of time which holds that this is how presence really is. For the A-theory, temporal presence is absolute; it is a special moment in time, a time defined by events in what has been called the A-series. For the B-theory, temporal presence is relative ; it is itself defined relative to moments in time, a time defined by events in the B-series. Many A-theorists go further to claim that the present is the only real moment in time; the past and future are unreal. One can have different sets of problems depending on whether one thinks in terms of absolute presence or relative presence. For example, there is the concept of the 'specious' present – a duration many theorists claim that we perceptually experience. It is argued in this paper that the specious present has problems given absolute presence, which it does not have given relative presence. Many of the problems are avoided by having an extended present. However, A-theory, the standard theory of time which advocates absolute presence, cannot have an extended present. Further, the best solution for absolute presence which is extended, durational presentism, involves denying the standard theories in the philosophy of time.
Keywords Presence  Specious present  relativity  A-theory  B-theory  Presentism  Eternalism  Subjective time  Objective time
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Present Vs. The Specious Present.Jiri Benovsky - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):193-203.
Varieties of Presence.Alva Noë - 2012 - Harvard University Press.
Time, Presence, and Historical Injustice.Berber Bevernage - 2008 - History and Theory 47 (2):149–167.
Absolute Time Before Newton.Emmaline Bexley - 2009 - Dissertation, The University of Melbourne
Presence and Post-Modernism.James Mensch - 1997 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):145-156.
Why Does Time Pass?Bradford Skow - 2012 - Noûs 46 (2):223-242.
Time, Event and Presence in the Late Heidegger.Françoise Dastur - 2014 - Continental Philosophy Review 47 (3-4):399-421.
Real Presence in the Eucharist and Time-Travel.Martin Pickup - 2015 - Religious Studies 51 (3):379-389.
No Time Travel for Presentists.Steven D. Hales - 2010 - Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360.
1. Spots of Time.Eelco Runia - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (3):305–316.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-29

Total views
30 ( #381,021 of 2,506,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes