Abstract
In theory, a competent patient may refuse any and all treatments, even those that sustain life. The problem with this theory, confidently and frequently asserted, is that the circumstances of real patients may so confound us with their complexity as to shake our confident assumptions to their core.For instance, it is not the case that one may always and easily know which patients are competent. Indeed, evaluation of decision-making capacity is notoriously difficult. Not only may reasonable and experienced evaluators, say a judge and a psychiatrist, disagree, but also a person's capacity may change from hour to hour and may extend to some decisions yet not to others. And yet it is on this subtle art of capacity evaluation that life and death decisions often turn, especially when patients decline life-sustaining treatment.An evaluation of capacity may consider the impact of serious medical or psychiatric illness, as well as the patient's life circumstances.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1996.tb01833.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case of Mr. Sims.James R. Thobaben - 1995 - HEC Forum 7 (2-3):94-109.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
12 ( #769,560 of 2,433,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes