An appreciation of John Pollock's work on the computational study of argument

Argument and Computation 3 (1):1 - 19 (2012)

Authors
John Horty
University of Maryland, College Park
Abstract
John Pollock (1940?2009) was an influential American philosopher who made important contributions to various fields, including epistemology and cognitive science. In the last 25 years of his life, he also contributed to the computational study of defeasible reasoning and practical cognition in artificial intelligence. He developed one of the first formal systems for argumentation-based inference and he put many issues on the research agenda that are still relevant for the argumentation community today. This paper presents an appreciation of Pollock's work on defeasible reasoning and its relevance for the computational study of argument. In our opinion, Pollock deserves to be remembered as one of the founding fathers of the field of computational argument, while, moreover, his work contains important lessons for current research in this field, reminding us of the richness of its object of study
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/19462166.2012.663409
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons as Defaults.John Horty - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7:1-28.
Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
The Right and the Good.W. D. Ross & H. W. B. Joseph - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (19):517-527.
Perceiving: A Philosophical Study.R. J. Hirst - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 9 (37):366-373.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Truth in Evidence and Truth in Arguments Without Logical Omniscience.Gregor Betz - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1117-1137.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification.Pollock † & L. John - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):7-22.
The Collapse of Collective Defeat: Lessons From the Lottery Paradox.Kevin B. Korb - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:230-236.
Self-Defeating Arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Pollock on Probability in Epistemology. [REVIEW]Branden Fitelson - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):455 - 465.
The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology.Ron Sun (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
The Semantic Challenge to Computational Neuroscience.Rick Grush - 2001 - In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 155--172.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-14

Total views
43 ( #208,062 of 2,286,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #195,941 of 2,286,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature