Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328 (2008)

This article presents a formal dialogue game for adjudication dialogues. Existing AI & law models of legal dialogues and argumentation-theoretic models of persuasion are extended with a neutral third party, to give a more realistic account of the adjudicator’s role in legal procedures. The main feature of the model is a division into an argumentation phase, where the adversaries plea their case and the adjudicator has a largely mediating role, and a decision phase, where the adjudicator decides the dispute on the basis of the claims, arguments and evidence put forward in the argumentation phase. The model allows for explicit decisions on admissibility of evidence and burden of proof by the adjudicator in the argumentation phase. Adjudication is modelled as putting forward arguments, in particular undercutting and priority arguments, in the decision phase. The model reconciles logical aspects of burden of proof induced by the defeasible nature of arguments with dialogical aspects of burden of proof as something that can be allocated by explicit decisions on legal grounds.
Keywords Legal argument  Legal procedure  Adjudication  Dialogue games
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-008-9066-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
Mathematical Models of Dialogue.C. L. Hamblin - 1971 - Theoria 37 (2):130-155.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Formalising Ordinary Legal Disputes: A Case Study. [REVIEW]Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359.
Argumentation Without Arguments.Henry Prakken - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):171-184.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #300,455 of 2,432,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,136 of 2,432,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes