Contrary-to-duty obligations

Studia Logica 57 (1):91 - 115 (1996)
Abstract
We investigate under what conditions contrary-to-duty (CTD) structures lacking temporal and action elements can be given a coherent reading. We argue, contrary to some recent proposals, that CTD is not an instance of defeasible reasoning, and that methods of nonmonotonic logics are inadequate since they are unable to distinguish between defeasibility and violation of primary obligations. We propose a semantic framework based on the idea that primary and CTD obligations are obligations of different kinds: a CTD obligation pertains to, or pre-supposes, a certain context in which a primary obligation is already violated. This framework is presented initially as an extension of Standard Deontic Logic (SDL), a normal modal logic of type KD, and is illustrated by application to a series of examples. The concluding section is concerned with some resemblances between CTD and defeasible reasoning. We show first that the SDL-based framework contains a flaw and must be adjusted. A discussion of possible adjustments, including an alternative treatment in terms of a preference-based semantics, reveals difficulties that are reminiscent of problems in defeasible reasoning and intensional accounts of defeasible conditionals.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00370671
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,208
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Defaults in Update Semantics.Frank Veltman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261.
Gentle Murder, or the Adverbial Samaritan.James William Forrester - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):193-197.
Five Faces of Minimality.David Makinson - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (3):339 - 379.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Equivalence of Defeasible Normative Systems.José Júlio Alferes, Ricardo Gonçalves & João Leite - 2013 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23 (1-2):25-48.
Obligations and Prohibitions in Talmudic Deontic Logic.M. Abraham, D. M. Gabbay & U. Schild - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):117-148.
Detaching If-Clauses From Should.Ana Arregui - 2010 - Natural Language Semantics 18 (3):241-293.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Defeasible Reasoning and Logic Programming.Timothy R. Colburn - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):417-436.
A Logic of Comparative Obligation.Mark A. Brown - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):117 - 137.
The Epistemic Basis of Defeasible Reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):437-458.
A Theory of Hierarchical Consequence and Conditionals.Dov M. Gabbay & Karl Schlechta - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (1):3-32.
Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (03):249-267.
Abstract Argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

32 ( #161,319 of 2,172,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #75,840 of 2,172,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums