Thinking and Reasoning 12 (3):309 – 328 (2006)
Matching bias refers to the non-normative performance that occurs when elements mentioned in a rule do not correspond with those in a test item. One aim of the present work is to capture matching bias via reaction times as participants carry out truth-table evaluation tasks. Experiment 1 requires participants to verify conditional rules, and Experiment 2 to falsify them as the paradigm employs four types of conditional sentences that systematically rotate negatives in the antecedent and consequent; and presents predominantly cases having true antecedents. These experiments reveal that mismatching is linked to higher rates of incorrect responses and slower evaluation times. A second aim is to investigate the way not is processed. We compare a narrow view of negations, which argues that negation only denies information, to a search for alternatives view, which says that negations function to prime appropriate alternatives. Findings from both experiments support a narrow reading view
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Attentional Bias Toward Low-Intensity Stimuli: An Explanation for the Intensity Dissociation Between Reaction Time and Temporal Order Judgment?P. Jaskowski & R. Verleger - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (3):435-456.
Matching Versus Optimal Data Selection in the Wason Selection Task.Hiroshi Yama - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):295 – 311.
Deductive Reasoning and Matching-Bias Inhibition Training: Evidence From a Debiasing Paradigm.Sylvain Moutier, Nathalie Angeard & Olivier Houde - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (3):205 – 224.
Contrast Classes and Matching Bias as Explanations of the Effects of Negation on Conditional Reasoning.Mike Oaksford - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):135 – 151.
Matching Bias in Conditional Reasoning: Do We Understand It After 25 Years?Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):45 – 110.
Matching Bias and Set Sizes: A Discussion of Yama (2001).Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):153 – 163.
Matching Bias in the Selection Task is Not Eliminated by Explicit Negations.Edgar Erdfelder, Karl Christoph Klauer & Christoph Stahl - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):281-303.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads31 ( #158,664 of 2,143,797 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #51,780 of 2,143,797 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.