An interesting fallacy concerning dynamical supertasks

Recently, Alper, Bridger, Earman and Norton have all proposed examples of dynamic systems that, in their view, are incompatible with classical (Newtonian) mechanics. In the first section of the present paper I shall show that their arguments are all undermined by the same fallacy. The second section proves that their conclusions of incompatibility are indeed false, and that what we are really looking at are new forms of indeterminist evolution of the same kind as that found recently in the literature on supertasks. In the third section of the paper, I argue that one of these new forms of evolution is particularly interesting, and that analysis of it leads to a new vision of the relation between interaction by contact and impenetrability. Introduction The fallacy Understanding some physical supertasks A philosophically interesting implication: contact and impenetrability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axi119
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,150
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Global Interaction in Classical Mechanics.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):173 – 183.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

52 ( #97,810 of 2,152,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #89,723 of 2,152,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums