Metascience 8 (2):233-243 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | Philosophy Philosophy of Science History Interdisciplinary Studies Philosophy of Biology Philosophy of Technology |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2008 |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF02913265 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Consolations for the Specialist1.Paul Feyerabend - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. pp. 197.
VIII.—An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience.P. K. Feyerabend - 1958 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58 (1):143-170.
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological Issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science.Matteo Collodel - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:27-56.
La Crítica de Paul Karl Feyerabend Al Modelo Neo-Positivista Del Significado.María Teresa Gargiulo de Vázquez - 2014 - Arbor 190 (769):a168.
Similar books and articles
Author's Response.Review author[S.]: Philip S. Kitcher - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):653-673.
Author's Response: The Continuous Reconstruction of a Pluralistic Society as an Order of Expectations.L. Leydesdorff - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):97-99.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-01
Total views
21 ( #491,663 of 2,409,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,494 of 2,409,928 )
2013-12-01
Total views
21 ( #491,663 of 2,409,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,494 of 2,409,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
