A reluctant stakeholder? On the perception of corporate social responsibility among european trade unions
Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 17 (2):149–160 (2008)
Abstract
Seen from a national business system perspective, the notion of corporate social responsibility emerges as a specifically US‐American response to challenges regarding the corporate place in society. With the spread of American capitalism, however, CSR is bound to come into contact – and conflict – with other approaches to the role of business in society that have been shaped by different national cultures. Within Europe, one such area of potential conflict concerns the role of organised labour in representing employee interests. Studying the perceptions held by European trade unions on stakeholding, as one of the important concepts in the CSR discourse, does indeed reveal a considerable degree of union scepticism of CSR and its terminology. There is, however, also embryonic evidence of at least some unions attempting to link the CSR discourse to traditional union goals. Furthermore, national differences in union responses to CSR are beginning to emerge, which may, in turn, further shape the evolution of national business systems in EuropeDOI
10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00528.x
My notes
Similar books and articles
An examination of business students' perception of corporate social responsibilities before and after bankruptcies.Rafik Z. Elias - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (3):267-281.
Does the Stakeholder Theory Constitute a New Kind of Theory of Social Responsibility?Thomas L. Carson - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):171-176.
The role of labour-oriented research for social shaping of work and technology within the European union.Volker Telljohann - 1994 - AI and Society 8 (3):235-244.
Third Way CR and Third World CR: In What Way Should Responsible Corporations Serve the World?Loke Min Foo - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:35-53.
Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.k. Firms.Diana C. Robertson & Nigel Nicholson - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1095 - 1106.
Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility: Making Business Ethics A Two-Way Conversation.Andrew C. Wicks - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):375-398.
Corporate social responsibility in the european communities — the scandinavian viewpoint.Morten P. Broberg - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (6):615 - 622.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#405,135)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#405,135)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Principle of Good Faith: Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement.Cedric E. Dawkins - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (2):1-13.
Multiple institutional logics in union–NGO relations: private labor regulation in the Swedish Clean Clothes Campaign.Niklas Egels-Zandén, Kajsa Lindberg & Peter Hyllman - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (4):347-360.
Glass Houses? Market Reactions to Firms Joining the UN Global Compact.Jay J. Janney, Greg Dess & Victor Forlani - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):407-423.
One Vision, Different Paths: An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives in Europe.François Maon, Valérie Swaen & Adam Lindgreen - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 143 (2):405-422.
Differences in Organizing Between Unions and NGOs: Conflict and Cooperation Among Swedish Unions and NGOs.Niklas Egels-Zandén & Peter Hyllman - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (2):249-261.