Critical Horizons 7 (1):251-275 (2006)

This article examines the link between oligarchy and the notion of representative democracy, which for Castoriadis also implies the bureaucratisation of society. However, in an argument with and against Castoriadis, one has to decipher modern oligarchies before launching into a radical critique of the principle of representation. There is a diversity of representative democracies, and the complexity of modernity comes from a mixture of oligarchy, representation and democracy. Even though the idea of democracy has evolved, we do not live under representative democracies but under liberal oligarchies. Direct democratic procedures and representative elements can sometimes be gathered in order to create new forms of political commitment. The main problem is avoiding a concentration of powers, which cannot create the conditions for the emergence of democratic institutions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156851606779308170
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,321
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pouvoir, politique, autonomie.Cornelius Castoriadis - 1988 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (1):81 - 104.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
57 ( #177,333 of 2,419,781 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,712 of 2,419,781 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes