Epistemology and intrinsic values: Norton and Callicott's critiques of Rolston

Environmental Ethics 20 (4):409-428 (1998)
Debates over the existence of intrinsic value have long been central to professional environmental ethics. Holmes Rolston, III’s version of intrinsic value is, perhaps, the most well known. Recently, powerful critiques leveled by Bryan G. Norton and J. Baird Callicott have suggested that there is an epistemological problem with Rolston’s account. In this paper, I argue first that the debates over intrinsic value are as pertinent now as they have ever been. I then explain the objections that Norton and Callicott have raised against Rolston’s position. In the main body of the paper, I attempt to show that Rolston’s position can accommodate these objections. In this defense of Rolston’s position, I have two goals: first, to show that the notion of non-subjective intrinsic value in nature is coherent, and second, to illuminate the places where further philosophical work on intrinsic value remains to be done
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics19982047
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,655
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why There is No Evidence for the Intrinsic Value of Non-Humans.Toby Svoboda - 2011 - Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):25-36.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Can Nature Be Evil?: Rolston, Disvalue, and Theodicy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150.
Rolston on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction.J. Baird Callicot - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
The Source and Locus of Intrinsic Value: A Reexamination.Keekok Lee - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):297-309.
Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists?Ben A. Minteer - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (1):57-75.
Rolston, Lonergan, and the Intrinsic Value of Nature.Theodore W. Nunez - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):105 - 128.
Ferré: Organicistic Connectedness—But Still Speciesistic.Arthur Zucker - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):185 - 190.
Passion and Instrumentality.Alan McQuillan - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (3):317-324.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

24 ( #208,408 of 2,158,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums