Inquiry 32 (September):277-303 (1989)
One foundation of Eliminative Materialism is the claim that the totality of our ordinary resources for explaining and predicting behaviour, ?Folk Psychology?, constitutes a theoretical scheme, potentially in conflict with other theories of behaviour. Recent attacks upon this claim, as well as the defence by Paul Churchland, are examined and found to be lacking in a suitably realistic conception of theory. By finding such a conception, and by correctly identifying the level of conceptual structures within which Folk Psychology is located, the original claim is reinforced
|Keywords||Behavior Psychology Science Churchland, P|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Neurophilosophy: Toward A Unified Science of the Mind-Brain.Patricia S. Churchland - 1986 - MIT Press.
Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind.Paul M. Churchland - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Folk Psychology and the Explanation of Human Behavior.Paul M. Churchland - 1988 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 62:209-21.
Critter Psychology: On the Possibility of Nonhuman Animal Folk Psychology.Kristin Andrews - 2007 - In Daniel D. Hutto & Matthew Ratcliffe (eds.), Folk Psychology Re-Assessed. Kluwer/Springer Press. pp. 191--209.
Two Uses of Folk Psychology: Implications for Psychological Science.G. Fletcher - 1995 - Philosophical Psychology 8 (3):375-88.
Against Eliminative Materialism: From Folk Psychology to Volkerpsychologie.John D. Greenwood - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (4):349-68.
Beyond Eliminative Materialism: Some Unnoticed Implications Of Churchland's Pragmatic Pluralism.Teed Rockwell - 2011 - Contemporary Pragmatism 8 (1):173-189.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #141,300 of 2,158,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?