Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):91-101 (2008)
The place of Heinrich Hertz’s The principles of mechanics in the history of the philosophy of science is disputed. Here I critically assess positivist interpretations, concluding that they are inadequate.There is a group of commentators who seek to align Hertz with positivism, or with specific positivists such as Ernst Mach, who were enormously influential at the time. Max Jammer is prominent among this group, the most recent member of which is Joseph Kockelmans. I begin by discussing what Hertz and Mach had to say about one another, and I specify certain respects in which their views are indeed similar. I then go on to detail their differences, looking at Hertz’s attitude to the atomic theory, to the mechanical world-view, to simplicity, to unobservables and metaphysics, and his objections to Newtonian forces. I conclude that the positivist interpretation of Hertz’s mechanics significantly overplays its similarities to Mach’s views.Keywords: Ernst Mach; Heinrich Hertz; Mechanics; Positivism; Atomism; Force; Metaphysics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form.Heinrich Hertz, D. E. Jones & J. T. Walley - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (31):257-258.
Hertz, Wittgenstein and Philosophical Method.John Preston - 2008 - Philosophical Investigations 31 (1):48–67.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Phenomenology and Phenomenalism: Ernst Mach and the Genesis of Husserl's Phenomenology. [REVIEW]Denis Fisette - 2012 - Axiomathes 22 (1):53-74.
On Photographs and Phonographs: New Techniques of Recording and Their Influence on Mach's Conception of Knowledge.Sabine Plaud - unknown
Ernst Mach and the Episode of the Monocular Depth Sensations.Erik C. Banks - 2001 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37 (4):327-348.
Sympathy for the Devil: Reconsidering Ernst Mach's Empiricism. [REVIEW]Erik C. Banks - 2012 - Metascience 21 (2):321-330.
Lützen on Hertz's Mechanics.John Preston - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):260-267.
Structure Versus Process: Mach, Hertz, and the Normative Aspect of Science. [REVIEW]Murat BaÇ - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):39-56.
Heinrich Hertz's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science, and its Development by Harald Høffding.Frederik Voetmann Christiansen - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):1 - 20.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #156,509 of 2,172,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,033 of 2,172,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?