Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):351 - 374 (2004)
This essay aims at neutralizing the contextualist challenge against traditional semantics. According to contextualism, utterances of non-elliptical, non-ambiguous, and non-indexical sentences may be associated with contrasting truth-conditions. In this essay, I grant the contextualist analysis of the sentences in question, and the contextualist assessment of the truth-conditions for the corresponding utterances. I then argue that the resulting situation is by no means incompatible with the traditional approach to semantics, and that the evidence put forth by the contextualists may easily be taken into account by the customary treatment of natural languages.
|Keywords||philpapers: predicates and context-dependence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Citations of this work BETA
Talking About Taste: Disagreement, Implicit Arguments, and Relative Truth.Isidora Stojanovic - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):691-706.
Experimenting on Contextualism.Nat Hansen & Emmanuel Chemla - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (3):286-321.
Color Adjectives and Radical Contextualism.Nathaniel Hansen - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (3):201 - 221.
Similar books and articles
Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste.Peter Lasersohn - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (6):643--686.
Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language.Stefano Predelli - 2005 - Clarendon Press.
Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning.Hans Kamp & Barbara Hall Partee (eds.) - 2004 - Elsevier.
Testing for Context-Dependence. [REVIEW]John Hawthorne - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):443–450.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads89 ( #58,619 of 2,172,660 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #56,362 of 2,172,660 )
How can I increase my downloads?