A note on the sorites paradox
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):74 – 75 (1979)
Abstract
Informal accounts of the sorites paradox usually emphasize that the problem is one of vagueness. The paper uses the idea of fuzzy truth values to provide a formal semantics which shows precisely how sorites-Type arguments are formally invalidAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1080/00048407912341061
My notes
Similar books and articles
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard Dewitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Facing Up to the Sorites Paradox.Terry Horgan - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:99-111.
Sorites paradox and conscious experience.Tamás Pólya & László Tarnay - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):165-165.
Cut-offs and their Neighbors.Achille C. Varzi - 2003 - In Jc Beall (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Clarendon Press. pp. 24–38.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
80 (#153,702)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2009-01-28
Downloads
80 (#153,702)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The surprise examination on the paradox of the Heap.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1984 - Philosophical Papers 13 (1):43-56.
Māyā and the pluralist predicament.Peter Forrest - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1):31-48.
References found in this work
Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues.Susan Haack - 1974 - London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. [REVIEW]George Lakoff - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4):458 - 508.