A note on the sorites paradox

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):74 – 75 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informal accounts of the sorites paradox usually emphasize that the problem is one of vagueness. The paper uses the idea of fuzzy truth values to provide a formal semantics which shows precisely how sorites-Type arguments are formally invalid

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard Dewitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Facing Up to the Sorites Paradox.Terry Horgan - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:99-111.
Sorites paradox and conscious experience.Tamás Pólya & László Tarnay - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):165-165.
Cut-offs and their Neighbors.Achille C. Varzi - 2003 - In Jc Beall (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Clarendon Press. pp. 24–38.
Parfit and the sorites paradox.J. M. Goodenough - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 83 (2):113-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#153,702)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Māyā and the pluralist predicament.Peter Forrest - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1):31-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Many-Valued Logic.Nicholas Rescher - 1969 - New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Wang's paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.
Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues.Susan Haack - 1974 - London and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references