Mind 105 (419):467-474 (1996)

Dowe (1996) argues that the success of the backward causation hypothesis in quantum mechanics would provide strong support for a version of Reichenbach's account of the direction of causal processes, which takes the direction of causation to rest on the fork asymmetry. He also criticises my perspectival account of the direction of causation, which takes causal asymmetry to be a projection of our own temporal asymmetry as agents. In this reply I take issue with Dowe's argument at three main points: his claim that the backward causation hypothesis in QM is incompatible with my perspectival approach to the direction of causation; his defence of the fork asymmetry approach against a general criticism of mine based on the time-symmetry of microphysics; and his application of his preferred account of the direction of causal processes to the relevant cases in QM
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/105.419.467
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Causation and Time Reversal.Matt Farr - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (1):177-204.
Common Causes and the Direction of Causation.Brad Weslake - 2005 - Minds and Machines 16 (3):239-257.
Asymmetry of Causation and Possibility of Backward Causation.Kunihisa Morita - 2010 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 38 (1):1-8.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #203,142 of 2,444,763 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 2,444,763 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes