Does moral philosophy rest on a mistake?

Mind 21 (81):21-37 (1912)
Abstract
Probably to most students of Moral Philosophy there comes a time when they feel a vague sense of dissatisfaction with the whole subject. And the sense of dissatisfaction tends to grow rather than to diminish. It is not so much that the positions, and still more the arguments, of particular thinkers seem unconvincing, though this is true. It is rather that the aim of the subject becomes increasingly obscure. "What," it is asked, "are we really going to learn by Moral Philosophy?" "What are books on Moral Philosophy really trying to show, and when their aim is clear, why are they so unconvincing and artificial?" And again: "Why is it so difficult to substitute anything better?" Personally, I have been led by growing dissatisfaction of this kind to wonder whether the reason may not be that the subject, at any rate as usually understood, consists in the attempt to answer an improper question. And in this article, I shall venture to contend that the existence of the whole subject, as usually understood, rests on a mistake, and on a mistake parallel to that on which rests, as I think, the subject usually called the Theory of Knowledge
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/XXI.81.21
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design. [REVIEW]Sabine Roeser - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):103-115.
The Normativity of Rationality.Jonathan Way - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1057-1068.
'Ought' and Control.Matthew Chrisman - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):433-451.
Evil and Moral Detachment: Further Reflections on The Mirror Thesis.Alfred Archer - 2016 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (2):201-218.
Autonomy as Second Nature: On McDowell's Aristotelian Naturalism.David Forman - 2008 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (6):563-580.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Does Twin Earth Rest on a Mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Does Modern Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?Roger Crisp - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54:75-93.
Does Moral Subjectivism Rest on a Mistake?Philippa Foot - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 46 (1):107-.
“Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?”.Alan Gettner - 1976 - Journal of Value Inquiry 10 (4):241-252.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
712 ( #1,669 of 2,192,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #2,954 of 2,192,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature