Hume’s Two Causalities and Social Policy: Moon Rocks, Transfactuality, and the UK’s Policy on School Absenteeism

Journal of Critical Realism 13 (4):385-398 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Hume maintained that, philosophically speaking, there is no difference between exiting a room out of the first-floor window and using the door. Nevertheless, Hume’s reason and common sense prevailed over his scepticism and he advocated that we should always use the door. However, we are currently living in a world that is more seriously committed to the Humean philosophy of empiricism than he was himself and thus the potential to act inappropriately is an ever-present potential. In this paper, I explore how Hume’s two versions of causality have detrimentally affected our ability both to arrive at and to use research to improve human well-being. I illustrate my argument with an example of what I think is an incorrect yet supposedly scientifically sound assumption: that absenteeism causes poor school attainment. Instead I make the interdisciplinary argument that absenteeism is better understood as an aggravating symptom of a number of other causes of poor attainment, such as poverty and individual psychological factors. I suggest that an instrumental, punitive policy against parents whose children tend to be absent from school may be ineffectual or even counterproductive if the objective is to improve the well-being of those children. To support my argument, I introduce the critical realist idea of transfactuality. Using the example of research into moon rocks, I show how mainstream science uses transfactuality despite its empiricist aversion to it. I also suggest that it is our honesty, integrity, and stoicism that lead us to the extreme overthrow of reason and common sense that we see today in many of the UK’s social policies; an overthrow that Hume himself did not achieve. Metaphorically speaking, British professionals, stoically and honestly believing in the ability of their trusted research correlations to guide their action, are exiting out of the first-floor window rather than using the door. This is a significant barrier to our ability to devise and implement social policy.

Similar books and articles

Hume on Economic Policy and Human Nature.Edward Soule - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (1):143-157.
David Hume on Monetary Policy: A Retrospective Approach.Maria Pia Paganelli - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):65-85.
Reflections of Being “A Man of Truancy”: 40 Years On.Ken Reid - 2012 - Educational Studies 38 (3):327-340.
Taking School Contexts More Seriously: The Social Justice Challenge.Martin Thrupp & Ruth Lupton - 2006 - British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (3):308-328.
Hume and Practical Reason: A Non-Sceptical Interpretation.Camillia Kong - 2013 - History of Political Thought 34 (1):89-113.
Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to Reason?Fred Wilson - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:275-319.
Social Justice, Education and Schooling: Some Philosophical Issues.John A. Clark - 2006 - British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (3):272-287.
Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to Reason?Fred Wilson - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:275-319.
New Labour and School Leadership 1997–2007.Helen Gunter & Gillian Forrester - 2008 - British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (2):144 - 162.
Why Hume Cannot Be A Realist.Jani Hakkarainen - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):143-161.
Was Hume a Subjectivist?Fred Wilson - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:247-282.
Hume on Animal Reason.Deborah Boyle - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):3-28.


Added to PP

220 (#55,221)

6 months
13 (#66,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leigh Price
Rhodes University

Citations of this work

Introduction to the Special Issue: Normativity.Leigh Price - 2019 - Journal of Critical Realism 18 (3):221-238.

Add more citations