Duncan Pritchard
University of California, Irvine
There are parallels between certain responses to local epistemological scepticism about religious belief and an influential reply to radical epistemological scepticism. What ties both accounts together is that they utilise, either implicitly or explicitly, a “hinge” proposition thesis which maintains that the pivotal beliefs in question are immune to sceptical attack even though they lack sufficient epistemic grounds. It is argued that just as this strategy lacks any anti-sceptical efficacy in the context of the radical sceptical debate, so it offers no defence against a localised scepticism regarding religious belief either. What the defender of religious belief should do, it is claimed, is re-examine the manner in which a commitment to the doctrine of epistemological internalism underlies the sceptical attack.
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1004046914561
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,704
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

God and the External World.Martin Smith - 2011 - Ratio 24 (1):65-77.
Moore and Wittgenstein on Radical Skepticism.Nicola Claudio Salvatore - 2016 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 5 (2):153-182.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
119 ( #77,001 of 2,340,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,750 of 2,340,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes