Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):221-243 (2002)
Abstract |
In his widely influential statement of just war theory, Michael Walzer exempts conscripted soldiers from all responsibility for taking part in war, whether just or unjust (the thesis of the moral equality of soldiers). He endows the overwhelming majority of civilians with almost absolute immunity from military attack on the ground that they aren't responsible for the war their country is waging, whether just or unjust. I argue that Walzer is much too lenient on both soldiers and civilians. Soldiers fighting for a just cause and soldiers fighting for an unjust one are not morally equal. A substantial proportion of civilians in a democracy are responsible, to a significant degree, for their country's unjust war. Moreover, under certain (admittedly rare) circumstances, some of them are legitimate targets of military attack. This has bearing on settling moral accounts in the wake of war and the issue of forgiving the wrongs done in its course: possible candidates for such forgiveness are much more numerous than is usually assumed.
|
Keywords | civilian immunity conscription ethics of war just war theory soldiers, responsibility of war |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1016032623634 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations.Michael Walzer - 1979 - Science and Society 43 (2):247-249.
Conventions and the Morality of War.George I. Mavrodes - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (2):117-131.
Citations of this work BETA
Remote Weaponry: The Ethical Implications.Suzy Killmister - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):121–133.
Public War and the Moral Equality of Combatants.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):2012.
“Hands Up Who Wants to Die?”: Primoratz on Responsibility and Civilian Immunity in Wartime.Robert Sparrow - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):299-319.
Varieties of Contingent Pacifism in War.Saba Bazargan-Forward - 2014 - In Helen Frowe & Gerald Lang (eds.), How We Fight. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-17.
Terrorism, War, and The Killing of the Innocent.Troy Jollimore - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):353-372.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Civilian Immunity, Supreme Emergency, and Moral Disaster.Igor Primoratz - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (4):371-386.
How to Judge Soldiers Whose Cause is Unjust.Judith Lichtenberg - 2008 - In David Rodin & Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford University Press. pp. 112--130.
The Leaders and the Led: Problems of Just War Theory.C. A. J. Coady - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):275 – 291.
Reconnoitering Combatant Moral Equality.Roger Wertheimer - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (1):60-74.
Licence to Kill? The Question of Just Vs. Unjust Combatants.Lene Bomann-Larsen - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160.
Benbaji on Killing in War and 'the War Convention'.Uwe Steinhoff - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):616-623.
Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare.Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
Responsibility and Culpability in War.Helene Ingierd & Henrik Syse - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):85-99.
Combatant Responsibility for Fighting in Unjust Wars: A Defense of a Limited Moral Equality of Soldiers.Jordy Rocheleau - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:93-106.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
322 ( #31,816 of 2,498,492 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,903 of 2,498,492 )
2009-01-28
Total views
322 ( #31,816 of 2,498,492 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,903 of 2,498,492 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads